A few bits of info from Pat!!!

2013 ASCB Meeting
New Orleans Louisiana
December 14-18, 2013

CBELife Sciences Education
December 2, 2013; 12 (4)

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Editorial
-----------------------------------------------------------------

 A Year of Firsts
 Erin L. Dolan
 CBE Life Sci Educ December 2, 2013
12:577-578; doi:10.1187/cbe.13-10-0198


This editorial recounts highlights from 2013 for CBE—Life Sciences
Education and notes activities on the horizon for 2014.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Letters to the Editor
-----------------------------------------------------------------

 PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics
 Karen M. Aguirre, Teresa C. Balser, Thomas Jack, Katherine E. Marley,
  Kathryn G. Miller, Marcy P. Osgood, Pamela A. Pape-Lindstrom, and Sandra
  L. Romano
 CBE Life Sci Educ December 2, 2013
12:579-581; doi:10.1187/cbe.13-09-0183


  Science Choreography: A Movement-Based Approach to Biology Teaching
 Laura Grabel, Michael Weir, Laurel F. Appel, Elizabeth Johnson, Richard
  McCarthy, and Liz Lerman
 CBE Life Sci Educ December 2, 2013
12:582-583; doi:10.1187/cbe.13-07-0131


  Transdisciplinary Training between Physics and Biology Led to the
  Development of the Hydrodynamics Laws
 Tamer Zeren
 CBE Life Sci Educ December 2, 2013
12:584-585; doi:10.1187/cbe.13-07-0128


-----------------------------------------------------------------
Features
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Approaches to Biology Teaching and Learning
-----------------------------------------------------------------

 “What if students revolt?”—Considering Student Resistance: Origins,
  Options, and Opportunities for Investigation
 Shannon B. Seidel and Kimberly D. Tanner
 CBE Life Sci Educ December 2, 2013
12:586-595; doi:10.1187/cbe-13-09-0190


Instructors attempting new teaching methods may have concerns that students
will resist nontraditional teaching methods. The authors provide an
overview of research characterizing the nature of student resistance and
exploring its origins. Additionally, they provide potential strategies for
avoiding or addressing resistance and pose questions about resistance that
may be ripe for research study.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
From the National Academies
-----------------------------------------------------------------

 Engaging Actively with Issues in the Responsible Conduct of Science:
  Lessons from International Efforts Are Relevant for Undergraduate
  Education in the United States
 John D. Clements, Nancy D. Connell, Clarissa Dirks, Mohamed El-Faham,
  Alastair Hay, Elizabeth Heitman, James H. Stith, Enriqueta C. Bond, Rita
  R. Colwell, Lida Anestidou, Jo L. Husbands, and Jay B. Labov
 CBE Life Sci Educ December 2, 2013
12:596-603; doi:10.1187/cbe.13-09-0184


This Feature describes a National Research Council project centered on
educating faculty in the Middle East/North Africa and Asia to use active
learning when teaching responsible conduct of science (RCS). It provides
insights for faculty in the United States as they engage students in the
intricacies of RCS or establish “train-the-trainer” programs at their home
institutions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Book Review
-----------------------------------------------------------------

 Denying Genetic Causality
 Karen G. Hales
 CBE Life Sci Educ December 2, 2013
12:604-605; doi:10.1187/cbe.13-09-0187


This edited volume of essays presents a countermainstream view against
genetic underpinnings for cancer, behavior, and psychiatric conditions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Research Methods
-----------------------------------------------------------------

 Best Practices for Measuring Students’ Attitudes toward Learning Science
 Matthew Lovelace and Peggy Brickman
 CBE Life Sci Educ December 2, 2013
12:606-617; doi:10.1187/cbe.12-11-0197


This review presents an overview of some of the common assessment tools
available to measure students' attitudes toward learning science. The
review also provides widely endorsed, straightforward recommendations for
analysis methods with theory and empirical evidence to support analysis
plans.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Articles
-----------------------------------------------------------------

 The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A New
  Instrument to Characterize University STEM Classroom Practices
 Michelle K. Smith, Francis H. M. Jones, Sarah L. Gilbert, and Carl E.
  Wieman
 CBE Life Sci Educ December 2, 2013
12:618-627; doi:10.1187/cbe.13-08-0154


To help institutions collect information on undergraduate teaching
practices, the authors developed a new classroom observation protocol known
as the Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS). This
protocol allows college science, technology, engineering, and mathematics
faculty, after a short training period, to reliably characterize how
faculty and students are spending their time in class.

 Development of the Biology Card Sorting Task to Measure Conceptual
  Expertise in Biology
 Julia I. Smith, Elijah D. Combs, Paul H. Nagami, Valerie M. Alto, Henry
  G. Goh, Muryam A. A. Gourdet, Christina M. Hough, Ashley E. Nickell,
  Adrian G. Peer, John D. Coley, and Kimberly D. Tanner
 CBE Life Sci Educ December 2, 2013
12:628-644; doi:10.1187/cbe.13-05-0096


The authors present the development of a novel assessment tool, the Biology
Card Sorting Task, designed to probe how individuals organize their
conceptual knowledge of biology. Results suggest that the task is robust in
distinguishing populations of biology experts and novices and represents a
useful tool for probing emerging biology conceptual expertise.

 Understanding Clicker Discussions: Student Reasoning and the Impact of
  Instructional Cues
 Jennifer K. Knight, Sarah B. Wise, and Katelyn M. Southard
 CBE Life Sci Educ December 2, 2013
12:645-654; doi:10.1187/cbe.13-05-0090


This paper characterizes in-class discussion of clicker questions among
upper-level biology majors, demonstrating that students exchanged ideas in
75% of the recorded clicker discussions, using high-quality reasoning
almost 50% of the time. In addition, when cued by the instructor to use
reasoning, they engaged in higher-quality discussions.

 Development of a Meiosis Concept Inventory
 Pamela Kalas, Angie O’Neill, Carol Pollock, and Gülnur Birol
 CBE Life Sci Educ December 2, 2013
12:655-664; doi:10.1187/cbe.12-10-0174


A 17-question Meiosis Concept Inventory (Meiosis CI) was designed,
developed, and validated to diagnose student misconceptions on meiosis, a
fundamental concept in genetics. The Meiosis CI targets large introductory
biology and genetics courses.

 The EvoDevoCI: A Concept Inventory for Gauging Students’ Understanding of
 Evolutionary Developmental Biology
 Kathryn E. Perez, Anna Hiatt, Gregory K. Davis, Caleb Trujillo, Donald P.
 French, Mark Terry, and Rebecca M. Price
 CBE Life Sci Educ December 2, 2013
12:665-675; doi:10.1187/cbe.13-04-0079


The authors present the development and validation of the EvoDevoCI, a
concept inventory for evolutionary developmental biology. This CI measures
student understanding of six core evolutionary developmental biology
(evo-devo) concepts using four scenarios and 11 multiple-choice items, all
inspired by authentic scientific examples. Distracters were designed to
represent the common conceptual difficulties students have with each
evo-devo concept.

 A Deliberate Practice Approach to Teaching Phylogenetic Analysis
 F. Collin Hobbs, Daniel J. Johnson, and Katherine D. Kearns
 CBE Life Sci Educ December 2, 2013
12:676-686; doi:10.1187/cbe-13-03-0046


The authors implemented a deliberate practice approach to engage students
over the course of a semester in a series of increasingly complex hands-on
tasks related to phylogenetic tree construction. Final exam scores, pre-
and postconcept surveys, and student feedback support that the approach
improved student comprehension of this difficult subject.

 Engagement and Skill Development in Biology Students through Analysis of
  Art
 Liliana Milkova, Colette Crossman, Stephanie Wiles, and Taylor Allen
 CBE Life Sci Educ December 2, 2013
12:687-700; doi:10.1187/cbe.12-08-0114


This work describes implementation and assessment of an art-based activity
that piques undergraduates' curiosity, broadens the ways in which students
meaningfully engage with course content and concepts related to human
biology, and develops aspects of students' higher-level thinking skills,
such as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation.

 Lessons Learned from Undergraduate Students in Designing a Science-Based
  Course in Bioethics
 John D. Loike, Brittany S. Rush, Adam Schweber, and Ruth L. Fischbach
 CBE Life Sci Educ December 2, 2013
12:701-710; doi:10.1187/cbe.13-01-0012


We present an analysis of students' approaches for identifying, resolving,
managing, and/or defusing bioethical issues as applied in the design of a
science-based course in bioethics.

 What Do I Want to Be with My PhD? The Roles of Personal Values and
  Structural Dynamics in Shaping the Career Interests of Recent Biomedical
  Science PhD Graduates
 Kenneth D. Gibbs, Jr. and Kimberly A. Griffin
 CBE Life Sci Educ December 2, 2013
12:711-723; doi:10.1187/cbe.13-02-0021


This paper addresses the process of career-interest formation as it relates
to faculty careers in a diverse cohort of 38 recent biomedical sciences PhD
graduates (including 23 women and 18 underrepresented minorities). The
authors show that personal values and structural dynamics in the biomedical
workforce play strong roles in shaping career interest.


Activation Energy
A Blog by Stefano Bertuzzi, Executive Director of the ASCB

This message was sent to pmars@learnlink.emory.edu.
To unsubscribe from this service, go to
To edit your subscriptions for this service, go to

Or by mail:
Customer Service * 425 Broadway St * Redwood City, CA 94063 * U.S.A.

_______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2013 by the American Society for Cell Biology.


No comments:

Post a Comment